Introduction: Slander as Judgment of the Law
James issues a stark ethical and theological warning against slander among believers:
Μὴ καταλαλεῖτε ἀλλήλων, ἀδελφοί…
“Do not speak against one another, brothers…”
He then explains that slandering a brother is functionally equivalent to judging the law itself, a bold theological statement that reverses the moral posture of the speaker: from obedient doer to presumptuous judge.
Μὴ καταλαλεῖτε ἀλλήλων, ἀδελφοί, ὁ καταλαλῶν ἀδελφοῦ καὶ κρίνων τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ καταλαλεῖ νόμου καὶ κρίνει νόμον· εἰ δὲ νόμον κρίνεις, οὐκ εἶ ποιητὴς νόμου, ἀλλὰ κριτής.
Morphological Breakdown
- Μὴ καταλαλεῖτε {mē katalaleíte} –
Form: present active imperative, 2nd person plural;
Verb: καταλαλέω = “to speak against, slander”;
Usage: prohibitive imperative with μή: “Stop slandering one another” - ὁ καταλαλῶν… καὶ κρίνων {ho katalalṓn… kai krínōn} –
Form: nominative masculine singular present active participles;
Translation: “the one who speaks against… and judges…”
Function: subject of the main verbs that follow
Notes: Both participles describe a single person engaging in both actions: verbal harm and moral judgment. - τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ {ton adelphón autoû} –
Form: accusative singular;
Meaning: “his brother”;
Object of: both participles. - καταλαλεῖ νόμου καὶ κρίνει νόμον –
Form: present active indicative, 3rd person singular;
Meaning: “speaks against the law and judges the law”
Notes: The logic: slandering your brother is equivalent to slandering the law (because the law commands love of neighbor). - εἰ δὲ νόμον κρίνεις {ei dè nómon kríneis} –
Form: conditional clause with εἰ (“if”);
Meaning: “but if you judge the law…”
Function: sets up the ethical conclusion. - οὐκ εἶ ποιητὴς νόμου, ἀλλὰ κριτής {ouk eî poiētḗs nómou, allà kritḗs} –
Form: present active indicative of εἰμί;
Meaning: “you are not a doer of the law, but a judge”
Contrast: Two identities: one humble (doer), the other presumptuous (judge)
Syntactical and Logical Structure
The logic of the verse unfolds like this:
– Premise: Do not slander one another.
– Explanation: He who slanders and judges his brother is actually speaking against and judging the law.
– Implication: If you set yourself above the law by judging it, you are no longer obedient to it, but evaluating it—a reversal of roles.
– Conclusion: You are not a ποιητὴς νόμου (“doer of the law”) but a κριτής (“judge”).
Theological Implications
– The Law (νόμος) here most likely refers to the royal law of love (cf. James 2:8–12).
– To judge your brother is to say, by implication, that God’s law is insufficient, thus placing oneself above it.
– The true posture of a believer is not to critique the law, but to obey it—that is, to love one another.
Literary and Ethical Force
This construction is rhetorically potent:
– Parallel participles: καταλαλῶν… κρίνων
– Parallel consequences: καταλαλεῖ νόμου… κρίνει νόμον
– Sharp contrast: οὐκ εἶ ποιητής… ἀλλὰ κριτής
James calls the reader to self-awareness:
> If you’re tearing down your brother,
> you’re tearing down the law that commands love.
Not a Doer, But a Judge
This sentence is a mirror:
– Are you a doer—humble, obedient, quiet?
– Or a judge—critical, elevated, self-appointed?
James says:
> The one who slanders a brother
> puts himself above the law.
> But love doesn’t climb above—
> it stoops to serve.